Wednesday, June 15, 2011
The Revisionists - Thomas Mullen
Apparently you can add Time-Travel But Like From The Future Back To Our Time Instead Of Other Ways to the list of Raych's Easy Buttons (along with Mad Relatives, Stoic Treks Over Frozen Wastes, Balls Jokes, and Wry Footnotes. Someone write me a book with all of these things and I swear I will kiss you on the mouth). This is a thing that I dig, fellows. I like the perspective on the present that it offers, the variation on the usual dystopic Remember how crazy we used to be with our resources/digital media/legs and now we have no water/social interaction/legs? Variety, I like your spice.
Ok but that was sort of an unnecessary aside because this book isn't about that as much as you (I) had originally thought. Because the blurb is all, Zed is from the future where everything is Perfect and he's part of a crack team that comes back into 'history' to keep people from keeping other people from killing yet more people. Like, the Revisionists want to come back to stop 9/11, but he has to be like, Nay, I will stop you from stopping that, because if someone changes history (even the bad bits), who knows how that will affect the Perfect Present?
And then the first few chapters are actually about that, and Zed walks around all This era is so bizarre for the following reasons etc etc etc and you are like, Yes, we are bizarre like that, and then he kills some people who are trying to stop some bad things but then the next chapter is just about, like, a regular dude who is not from the future and who has ordinary-person problems. And the chapter AFTER THAT is about Tasha, a woman whose brother was killed in the war, and a chapter still more after that is about Sari, the nanny-maid-slave-of-all-trades for a Korean diplomat.
And thing and then another thing and then finally, like all the best Guy Ritchie films, all the bits come together. And the WHOLE THING is about memory and history and how we account for our pasts and what we keep in our brain-pans and what we tweak a bit so that it jives better (what we revise, ya dig? We are all revisionists).
And it makes all sorts of sense until maybe halfway through, when it deviates from that bit of sense and starts wandering towards another one and you read to the end like When are we going to get some definative answers re: what kind of sense we are making but you don't, and one of two things might be true and either of them makes this a very different book. Ambiguous endings! I love you much. But also you give my brain a case of the hovering angst for, like, a day. MY BRAIN likes to know where the landing pad is, which is again maybe a commentary on our need to make sense of things etc.
A ripping good read, have I mentioned?
Eight and a half caterpillars.
Requisite ass-covering: book received at BEA, and it doesn't come out until Sept 28th and I'm sorry and I swear that I will eventually stop doing this so often but you can pre-order it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)



.
ReplyDeleteSeems so confusing. I don't know if I'd try it. Is it steampunk?
ReplyDeleteHa ha, no worries. I don't have time to read it now but I can lie to myself and pretend I'll have time to read it in September, so that's perfect!!
ReplyDeleteI've just ordered it for the library. I like the sound. Thank you.
I am dimly reminded of two YA books I really liked when I was a YA. They both have, more or less, something like your requested Time-Travel But Like From The Future Back To Our Time Instead Of Other Ways. Have you heard of or read Eva by Peter Dickinson, or Enchantress from the Stars by Sylvia Engdahl?
Oh no, oh no! I hate, hate, hate ambiguous endings! I never guess who-dunnits, and I lack the cognitive resources to fill in blanks. I need it ALL RESOLVED! I am now REVISING the order in which I will read my ARCs....
ReplyDeleteAll right then. You have intrigued me and I now have another book on my TBR shelf. Which is obviously not a real, physical shelf as this book has not been officially published. But my weighty, in-the-ether TBR shelf is now slightly weightier. If things can be weighty in the ether.
ReplyDeleteAnyway. Thanks!