Ok, everyone has those books that have been on your tbr pile so long that you've forgotten who recommended them or what they said about them, but they've taken on this sort of mythical status, like Coke did when I worked at Red Robin (which served Pepsi) and I had to spend all night telling people that there was no Coke, just Pepsi, nor no Diet Coke neither, just Diet Pepsi. And no Barqs, because that's Coke, too. And, like Coke, every time I went to the library and this book wasn't in, it moved further into the realm of the mysterious and I started to wonder if it was real at all. If it was, though, it must really be something.Recently, I remembered that the Library of the Town in Which I Now Live doesn't charge you for inter-library loans (the Library in the Town of Which I Lived Formerly did, which made it less of a library and more of a cheap bookstore, where you had to return the books promptly or it became a slightly-more-expensive bookstore). I've been hitting the old 'request' button pretty hard these days, so welcome to the beginning of Books For Which I Have Entirely Too High Expectations. Part One.
Firstly, even though I'm now three paragraphs in and haven't even touched the book, can I point out that this man's last name begins with three consonants? And I know that, yes, even the word 'three' begins with three consonants and it's really not that amazing, so can I point out that the letter 'b' follows the 'ch' combination? This is nuts.
So. I wanted to like this book. And I realize that it's written for Young Adults, and that it's about a teenager, and that it's a dog's year since I've seen my own teens, and that parts of it are actually quite sweet, but I didn't. And I can't put my finger on why. This is going to be the shittiest review ever.
Ok, The Perks of Being a Wallflower consists of a series of letters written by an anonymous teenage boy (who gives himself and his friends pseudonyms) to an anonymous reader who he heard 'listens and understands and doesn't try to sleep with people even if they could have.' It's like a diary, but with an audience. These letters detail Charlie's first year of high school (which, I hope you all remember, sucked. I don't care how attractive or popular or athletic or smart you were, you were nervous and angsty that whole year and so glad when it was over that you almost peed yourself). Charlie's a little on the shy side (see: title), so high school ends up being even harder for him than it was for you. But he ends up making a few friends and they go through some pretty rough times, and everyone comes out *spoiler* okay in the end.
And I guess it was everything a YA novel needs to be, and it touches on all the hot issues, but it just felt...forced. Because Charlie is apparently in advanced English, and his teacher tells him at the end that he's one of the most gifted people this teacher has ever met, let alone taught. This kind of stunned me, even though this teacher has been lending Charlie meaningful books and having him write not-for-credit essays throughout the whole book, because what Chbosky seems to have forgotten is that we're reading Charlie's writing! And I know, anonymous letters ≠ formal essay, but Charlie honestly sounds like either a bizarrely intelligent nine-year-old, or a twelfth-grader in remedial English who's trying to pull out all the stops so that he can graduate. This isn't brilliant writing, even for a 16-year-old. But then he has these thoughts that are very obviously Chbosky's, because they're too old and too jaded for Charlie, who is actually kind of endearing.
So...ech. Whatever. This is always easier to do when I either hated the book, or I lurved it.
Five caterpillars.


this does sound good! I have heard of it, but don't remember anything about it. I'll have to check it out!!
ReplyDeletegreat review, and I really like your page :)!
How did you make the 'does not equal' sign?
ReplyDeleteThe library of the town in which I now live charges $2 per interlibrary loan, $1 for a request from another branch, and $1 if you don't pick up a book you have on hold! I can't believe it! It has cut my reading forays down to what I can find on the shelves the very day I visit. I'm moving to a new town soon, and can't wait. I already checked their library out. Small stacks, but free loans. Yay!
ReplyDeleteMan, that's too bad. I had quite a love affair with this book when I read it a few years ago, but I fell in love with Charlie more than the quality of the writing, which I agree, is nothing to marvel about. Well, I'm glad you gave it a try anyway!
ReplyDeleteI really love this book. I really don't read books more than once but I'm planning on buying this one; It's so captivating. A lot of the issues that Charlie deals with I can relate to myself. (Although usually not to the level that Charlie experiences them.)
ReplyDelete"Ok, everyone has those books that have been on your tbr pile so long that you've forgotten who recommended them or what they said about them, but they've taken on this sort of mythical status"
ReplyDeleteYup. This being one of those books for me. It's honestly been on my list since I was in highschool myself. It sounds like something I would probably have enjoyed more back then (because I was more forgiving of little inconsistencies like the one you mentioned). But it sounds worth reading nonetheless.
Yeah, this is a funny one - I remember when it came out and it's gotten a lot of really good press but I always felt it was rather strange and doubted its teen appeal. I had the feeling Charlie had Asperberger's or something similar, and after a quick Google, it looks as if others have, too. But I can't recall if it's explicitly mentioned.
ReplyDeleteTime to get this book out of my tbr pile and into my hands!
ReplyDeleteI agree with your article- the book was quite jaded and seemed full of forced language from Chbosky. Your article is intriguing and mostly correct.
ReplyDeleteyo this book is schweeeeet!
ReplyDeletethis was a really good book that captivates the imagination of teenage readers and describes a part of high school that is hidden to most adults. I highly enjoyed the book and I think that all high school students and parents of teenagers should read this book and have an intelligent conversation on the content this book contains
ReplyDeleteI think that you failed to touch on a lot of great things about this book! The characterization was great, and Charlie's struggles have been powerful to teens everywhere. You shouldn't just touch on the subjects you didn't like, but also some positive issues too!
ReplyDeleteOK, I'm an exchange student from Argentina,I'm in Jamestown- NY.
ReplyDeleteso, in one of my classes the teacher give to us ''The perks of being a wallflower'' i didn'd finish yet, but i think it's going very good. It's interesting and catch you.
From the teenager's pint of view, Charlie is a very mature young man, and has a collected behavior for those his age. First off, to be able to have the ambition to read and then reflect and write about several books is an incredible talent. In school I have enough work going on to keep me busy alongside with clubs + organizations, family, and friends to even imagine reading and doing my own report on a book without even getting a grade. I think this reviewer's expectation's are way too high. Also, the entire novel is composed of letters to a complete stranger so the protagonist will naturally being writing informally, which will have a very different tone as opposed to his very formal essays. Charlie deserves a lot more credit than this review gives.
ReplyDeleteI love this book and I completely disagree with you. I relate to charlie and feel for him because I know his pain and his struggles. And another thing I really do not appreciate you mocking teenagers. So if you want to write a review about a book try not being such a bias ass next time.
ReplyDeleteI have to say that i completely disagree with your feelings on the book. I feel that you put the book into this super high standard and just because it wasn't what you expected, you don't like it. The book may not be as creative and be pretty blunt and straight forward, but it still captures teen's attention. If anything, the audience probably likes Charlie more than the actual structure of the book itself. I also think that you are making a mockery of teenagers today, but you have no idea what teens have said, seen or know.
ReplyDeletePersonally I think your review is well, garbage. I think you evaluated this book to your age range in which it's not written for. The way this book is written allows teens to relate to someone when they thought "I'm the only one who has been through this." The situations seem extreme, but these days, the situations are not that extreme it's just natural things teens go through. Of course I shouldn't expect you to understand that, or any adult for that matter because for some reason adults these days are oblivious to what is going on in teens live... IT'S ROUGH! All in all I think I think the book was great... and if you stop reading it as a adult and thinking about the book more in a teenage prospective I think you would like it...
ReplyDeleteI don't agree with the review. Personally, I thought the book was great and interesting. The book is controversial due to its lack of morality, yet it's a very real story that teens have been proven to benefit from, just by reading it.
ReplyDeleteThe protagonist, Charlie, is a very confused freshman entering a high school for the first time. Your review shouldn't be based on your personal experiences or taken as non-realistic at all. People experience things differently, and there's no reason his letters to an anonymous person should ever be expected to be as formal and "intelligent" as his essays are for his teacher. His teacher, Bill, thought Charlie was one of the most intelligent people he has ever met, due to not only his essays, but his personality and perception of the world and events around him. Charlie is very different from many kids his age, and he isn't comfortable in his own skin. Charlie simply has a complex train of thought and he doesn't know how to process them and apply his personality to his life and actions, therefore leading him to try new things, many of which are frowned upon in society.
Perks of Being a Wallflower is a great book, and it is definitely worthwhile to read. There are many underlying causes to Charlie's thoughts and actions, and a quick and careless review does the book no justice.
Well I do agree with one part of your review. It was indeed the shittiest review.
ReplyDeleteYou said yourself that this book is intended for young adults, unlike yourself. This review was obviously written after you made a careless observation of the book.
I am currently reading this literature in my Creative Expression class, and let me tell you, it's one of those books I can't seem to put down, it's just that good. Charlie's language is simple, but he's only a teenager so it's not like we expect him to be a great writer when it comes to writing a simple letter about his personal feelings and emotions. When he writes his essays for his advanced english class he's obviously going to be writing more formal than of him talking to a friend in a letter. And just because some of us aren't going through the same things as he is, doesn't mean it can't happen or that is has happened to young teenagers. I think some people don't like Charlie because of his believes or that he is too emotional all the time. But I think people need to give him a chance, in most books i've read, the main characters don't open up and aren't as real as Charlie is. The fact that he cares about others and wants people to care about him too makes me an amazing human being, mostly on the inside. His caring personality isn't something you find often in friends or in your high school or in many books. In my own personal opinion, I think this a great book of personal growth and adolescence. It's deff a good one to read and learn about another's feelings and emotions that you might not be able to find often in other humans.
ReplyDeleteThank you.
oy vey
ReplyDelete;-)
LOL this is hilarious. It looks like some teacher somewhere assigned their class to go reply to your review as homework!
ReplyDeleteAll that adolescent earnestness! I have to go lie down for a while.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous said (in one of his/her/its iterations): "...a part of high school that is hidden to most adults."
ReplyDeleteGuess what, kiddo? We all went to high school. Well, most of us, anyway, and most of us aren't doddering quite as close to an open grave as you think.
yes, it was an assignment : (
ReplyDeleteI love how all the anon comments were posted within 1/2/3/6 minutes of each other.....
ReplyDeleteraych, stop being a biased-ass.
Now I am dying of the curiosities. What was the nature of said assignment? What was the purpose? Who gives such an assignment? I am both delighted and quizzical. Someone please advise.
ReplyDeleteThe assignment was simply to reply to this review. We have been reading this book for a while in class and as part of the class being an "alternitive" english class a different kind of assignment for us to do was to reply with what we felt about this review.
ReplyDelete